tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22978179.post116044907397187016..comments2007-04-12T07:19:22.369-07:00sevenvoiceshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08018723336562689959noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22978179.post-1165954443060629622006-12-12T12:14:00.000-08:002006-12-12T12:14:00.000-08:00I've see enough of it to know that I've seen more I will care to see. I just think that these feminists are doing the very thing they always accuse men of doing: thinking with their genitalia.sevenvoiceshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12676229395169250000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22978179.post-1165367403655279742006-12-05T17:10:00.000-08:002006-12-05T17:10:00.000-08:00Oh Noes!<BR/><BR/>Did the nasty feminists shock the poor widdle conservative! <BR/><BR/>I am amazed how this play continues to shock almost 10 years after it was first performed.<BR/><BR/>It's interesting that the play directly confronts taboos about that particular body-part in a frank manner. The play is not just a "crusade" against violence, it is an exploration of many aspects of female sexuality. <BR/><BR/>I really dont have a problem with it, nor does most well-adjusted Americans. <BR/><BR/>Have you even seen this play? I find that when most fundamentalist christians criticize art they do so from a position of ignorance.Lance Duvalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16215741187306205939noreply@blogger.com